Ever wonder just how closely related humans are to chimpanzees? What about the similarities between a donkey and a horse? Questions like these are still being studied to this day, by scientists yet to find the full answer. Sure, it is easy to acknowledge outside resemblances between animals, but is there more to the picture than what meets the eye, say resemblances on the inside? There sure is. Lots more. They're called genes, and they're present in every living organism on the planet. There's only one problem: genes are too small to see with the naked eye. This makes it hard for the average Joe to picture such mind-boggling similarities between Man and Primate. Enter Phylo, a browser-based game that aims to distinguish common gene sequences of 3 or more species. The player (You) must match nucleotides from one species with as many nucleotides from another species as possible, but that's not all to the challenge: all nucleotides must stay in the order they were given to you. The point is not to match EVERY nucleotide by mixing the sequence up, but to take what is actually sequenced in each specimen and slide groups of nucleotides from one organism to similar chains in other organisms. The score you get is based on the number of matches made, and the number of spaces between groups of nucleotides (the less spaces made for matching, the less room for error). It may seem like jargon at first, but really it's simplicity allows for folks of all ages to try their hand at improving science. My question to you is this: Why do you think it is beneficial for science to get help from the public instead of relying on their own intuition and computer software? Leave comments below.

I think getting a second (or more) opinion on anything is always good, especially when it is from an unlikely source with a different viewpoint. Science is rarely done by one person alone with no outside help. Using one's own intuition or computer software may be disadvantageous at times when other humans are needed that have nothing to do with the field of science, even if it is just for the sake of stepping back and seeing the bigger picture.
ReplyDeleteGood question. I think it is actually smart of them to get a second opinion. People of the same community (science background) tend to think the same, plus or minus some disagreements they may have. Therefore, going outside this group will help acknowledge some things others probably never thought of.
ReplyDeleteThis is actually a process important for phylogenetic analysis called alignment. It can be computationally laborious because it is what they call "Non polynomial-time complete"...which means that the only way gurantee that one finds the best solution is to look at all of them...and that's not all. What is should the cost of a substitution be versus a gap (an insertion/deletion)? I have spent many hours doing this on big data sets. Fun but ultimately mind-numbing.
ReplyDelete